What we missed
Canada 1-0 Chile: We Called the Win, Not the Lockout
Canada won, the defence held, but Chile never scored. Our over 2.5 goals and second half goal calls both went down. Here is what happened.

Canada won. Canada kept a clean sheet. And we still got two of our main calls wrong. That is international football for you.
What We Got Right
The bones of our read were sound. Canada dominated, scored in the first half, and their defensive fortress did exactly what four clean sheets in six games told us it would. The half-time result call landed. The first half goal landed. The 1-4 goals range landed. Canada scoring at least once landed. We were right about the game shape: Canada controlled territory and tempo, Chile sat deeper and looked for transitions that never really came.
That part felt good. Less good was everything that relied on a second goal arriving.
Where It Fell Apart
We called over 2.5 goals. We called a second half goal. We called Chile to score. All three missed, and they missed for the same reason: Canada's defence in the second half was simply immovable.
Sheila
Chile average two goals a game scored. Canada have David and Larin. The second half with fresh legs and subs? Someone is scoring.
That logic was not unreasonable on paper. Chile do score. Canada do attack. Friendlies do open up in the second half. But Canada's backline had other ideas, and Chile never found a way through in either half. A clean sheet was always possible against this defence, and we acknowledged it in our notes. We just did not weight it heavily enough when it came to the second half goal market.
On the total goals call, we went over 2.5. The honest version is that we leaned on Chile's attacking numbers without fully respecting what Canada's defensive record was screaming at us.
Sheila
The Poisson doesn't know Canada's defence is that tight. Four clean sheets in six. I trust the defensive numbers more than the xG here.
Sheila said it in our pre-match conversation and then we went and under-applied it to the goal total markets. That is the tension we did not resolve cleanly enough before kick-off.
The exact score call of 2-1 was always a long shot by nature, but 1-0 was the most Canada result imaginable given their form. We knew the clean sheet was plausible. We just did not build our market calls around that possibility with enough discipline.
What It Tells Us Going Forward
Canada's defensive numbers are not noise. Four clean sheets in six is a real pattern, not a run of soft opposition luck, and this result adds another data point. When Canada are at home and dialed in defensively, backing under markets or clean sheet adjacent calls deserves serious weight, even against sides with genuine attacking quality.
Chile under their current setup are a team in transition. Their attacking numbers from this camp do not tell the full story when you factor in the quality of opposition defence. Projecting two goals a game against a back line this organised was always optimistic.
The win was right. The shape was right. The second half lockout is what we missed, and that is on us for not following our own defensive data all the way to its logical conclusion.
See every call Tom and Sheila have made, win or miss.
See the record